# Aluratek WiFi Frame

> Entertainment

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1243434526](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1243434526)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id1243434526`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Aluratek
- **Category:** Entertainment
- **Rating:** 1.30 / 5 (127 ratings)
- **Version:** 2.0
- **Last updated:** 2019-11-21
- **First published:** 2017-06-05
- **Size:** 22 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-23
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/aluratek-wifi-frame/id1243434526)
- **Privacy policy:** [https://aluratek.com/privacy-and-security/](https://aluratek.com/privacy-and-security/)

## Description

The Aluratek WiFi Frame extension lets you bind a device to your Aluratek Cloud Digital Photo Frame using its serial number, establishing a direct connection for media transfer.

Once bound, you can send gallery photos or capture new pictures to share, and you can even record a short video to your bound frame.

## Rankings

- #198,558 — Overall

## Review summary

Frequent app crashes, binding failures, and photo upload issues dominate reviews. Users also report unresponsive support and a perception that the frame is overpriced for a product with persistent reliability problems. The concept of wireless photo sharing is appealing, but the app's instability undermines the frame's usefulness.

### Pros

- Concept of wireless photo sharing to a digital frame is appealing, and some users reported the idea works when the app is functioning.
- For a subset of users, the frame previously worked and displayed photos before issues began, indicating potential in ideal conditions.

### Cons

- App crashes or freezes frequently, making it hard to use the frame or upload photos.
- Binding the frame to the iPhone is unreliable, with repeated failures or random unbinding.
- Photos do not upload or appear on the frame despite the app indicating success.
- Support is often unresponsive or slow to respond to issues.
- The product is perceived as overpriced given the persistent reliability problems.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Aluratek Smart Frame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1454353585) — 1.80 / 5
- [Aluratek eFrame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6741623230) — 3.00 / 5
- [Aluratek Frametime](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1571594901) — 4.20 / 5
- [Wi-Fi Photo Frame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1524618964) — 4.50 / 5
- [KODAK WiFi Photo Frame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1476805768) — 1.10 / 5
- [JointFrame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1530792288) — 1.50 / 5
- [Metaframe](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6444181942) — 1.40 / 5
- [Aluratek Action Camera](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1478836038) — 5.00 / 5
- [KODAK Smart Frame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6761799902)
- [BiuFrame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1577900086) — 1.90 / 5
- [SSA WiFi Frame - photo sharing](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1475191516) — 4.10 / 5
- [Polaroid Wi-Fi Photo Frame](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1413028322) — 2.40 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1243434526)