# Medieval Battle Simulator

> Simulation

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1189738541](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1189738541)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id1189738541`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** yizhan ye
- **Category:** Simulation
- **Rating:** 3.30 / 5 (271 ratings)
- **Version:** 3.3
- **Last updated:** 2018-04-09
- **First published:** 2017-01-03
- **Size:** 194 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-25
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/medieval-battle-simulator/id1189738541)

## Description

Set up your troops and watch them battle in a physics-based medieval arena. This game blends realistic physics with smart strategy to create engaging combat. Fight with swords, shields, spears, bows, cannons and more, and prepare to be immersed in epic battles.

Mastering tactics, unit placement, and timing determines the victor. Explore different formations, experiment with weapons, and enjoy fast, dynamic battles in a richly themed medieval world.

## Rankings

- #106,037 — Overall

## Review summary

Users praise Medieval Battle Simulator for its diverse unit roster and large-scale siege battles, offering a unique medieval battle experience with sandbox-like play. However, many reviews note significant downsides: overly hard levels (level 6), pay-to-win monetization, poor graphics, historical inaccuracies, and a lack of updates. Overall, the concept is compelling for fans of medieval warfare, but execution and monetization hinder long-term enjoyment.

### Pros

- Diverse unit roster and medieval weapons (archers, spearmen, knights, catapults) enabling varied tactics.
- Great for setting up large-scale sieges and epic battles with custom arrangements.
- Offers a unique medieval battle simulation experience with few near equivalents.
- Supports a sandbox/custom-style play that encourages experimentation.

### Cons

- Extremely difficult levels with unfair AI; progression is punishing (e.g., level 6 is almost impossible).
- Monetization and pay-to-win elements (can't progress past lv16 without spending money on special units).
- Graphics are criticized as poor or not up to modern standards.
- Not historically accurate in weapon ranges/tactics.
- Lack of updates and stagnation since release.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Medieval War Simulator](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1311072575) — 3.40 / 5
- [Steel Strategy: Medieval War](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6748252588)
- [Medieval Battlefields](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1108352969) — 4.50 / 5
- [Knights vs Dragons Battle Sim](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1506483395) — 4.30 / 5
- [Medieval Skirmishes](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1278014361) — 3.50 / 5
- [Boxy Strike Battle Simulator](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1244564757) — 3.50 / 5
- [Ultimate Battle Simulator](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1229445376) — 3.50 / 5
- [Battle Match: Samurai Wars](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6746539695) — 5.00 / 5
- [Battle Simulator Royale](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1270013710) — 3.90 / 5
- [Idle Empires: Battle Simulator](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6736528640)
- [Wars of the Roses](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id969868386) — 4.40 / 5
- [Battle Simulator :3D War](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1510716335) — 3.60 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1189738541)