# World Warfare

> Strategy

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1035495958](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1035495958)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id1035495958`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Leshi Entertainment Co., Ltd.
- **Category:** Strategy
- **Rating:** 4.10 / 5 (783 ratings)
- **Version:** 2.0.22
- **Last updated:** 2026-06-30
- **First published:** 2015-09-22
- **Size:** 829 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-15
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/world-warfare/id1035495958)
- **Privacy policy:** [http://www.joycrafter.com/TermsOfUseAndPrivacyPolicy.html](http://www.joycrafter.com/TermsOfUseAndPrivacyPolicy.html)

## Description

World Warfare blends sandbox-style strategy with real-time WWII battlefield combat. Command iconic units like the Tiger Heavy Tank, M4 Sherman, and P-51 Mustang across varied maps, using skill and strategy to dominate the front.

Forge alliances, conquer resources, and rise through the ranks with live battles, alliance camaraderie, and tournament rewards. Control single units or large formations with a fingertip, and shape your destiny as a commander.

## Rankings

- #63,995 — Overall
- #41 — awesome

## Review summary

The World Warfare reviews describe a fun, deep strategy game with engaging battles, strong unit variety, and meaningful social coordination. However, the game is repeatedly criticized for pay-to-win balance that rewards spending and hurts casual players, and for lacking PvE or campaign modes to provide a slower, more accessible path. Users also report account and billing problems, unresponsive support, and frequent technical issues like network errors and loading failures. Additionally, the game is seen as a time sink requiring constant online presence, making it difficult for casual players to engage over the long term.

### Pros

- Fun, addictive strategy with deep mechanics and lots of upgrades, plus unit variety.
- Engaging battles that require coordination with others; meaningful social/coordination aspect.
- Persistent progression and strategic depth that keeps players invested.

### Cons

- Pay-to-win imbalance that favors paying players, leading to frustration for casual players.
- Lack of PvE/campaign/sandbox modes; requests for campaign-style or PvE play to avoid constant PvP.
- Account/billing issues and unresponsive customer support, including charges with no refunds and accounts being locked or reset.
- Technical issues: frequent network errors, loading problems, and performance inconsistencies between devices.
- Time sink and requirement to stay online constantly; heavy demand on time and constant play, reducing accessibility for casual players.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [World Warfare 1944: WW2 Game](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1568232767) — 4.50 / 5
- [WW2: World War Strategy Games](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1420982632) — 4.20 / 5
- [Worldfront](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6748068530) — 4.10 / 5
- [War Alert: WWⅡ PVP RTS](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6503938135) — 3.80 / 5
- [WW2: Strategy World War Games](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1542704988) — 4.80 / 5
- [World War Armies: RTS Game](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1506931934) — 4.70 / 5
- [Second World War Online](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1552679159) — 4.30 / 5
- [Grand War 5: WW2 Strategy Game](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6758200519)
- [War Strategy: Army men games](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6479632207) — 4.70 / 5
- [War Vow](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6749140416) — 4.70 / 5
- [World at War WW2 Strategy MMO](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1124468718) — 4.30 / 5
- [World Conqueror 4](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1258468290) — 4.70 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1035495958)