# flash vs flash reverse

> Listing details for flash-vs-flash-reverse.

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/flash-vs-flash-reverse](https://chrome-stats.com/d/flash-vs-flash-reverse)

## Overview

- **ID:** `flash-vs-flash-reverse`
- **Platform:** Firefox
- **Type:** Firefox add-on
- **Status:** Removed (abandoned)
- **Publisher:** diego
- **Weekly downloads:** 1
- **Version:** 2.0
- **Last updated:** 2019-05-13
- **First published:** 2016-03-28
- **Size:** 737 KB
- **Data as of:** 2026-08-04
- **Store listing:** [Firefox Add-ons Store](https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/flash-vs-flash-reverse/)

## Safety

- **Risk impact:** Very low risk impact
- **Risk likelihood:** Very high risk likelihood

### Analysis details

- This permission has no access or impact on the user's system or data, thus carrying no risk.
- This extension is not longer available in the store

> Some risk analysis details are omitted from this free response. [Upgrade to view the full analysis](https://chrome-stats.com/pricing).

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Reverse Flash](https://chrome-stats.com/d/reverse-flash)
- [Flash vs Reverse Flash by CP](https://chrome-stats.com/d/flash-vs-reverse-flash-by-cp) — 2 users, 4.40 / 5
- [flash-01](https://chrome-stats.com/d/flash-01)
- [colorflash](https://chrome-stats.com/d/colorflash)
- [The Flash vs. Reverse Flash](https://chrome-stats.com/d/the-flash-vs-reverse-flash)
- [flashback](https://chrome-stats.com/d/flashback)
- [Fireflash](https://chrome-stats.com/d/fireflash) — 10 users, 4.09 / 5
- [Flash](https://chrome-stats.com/d/flash) — 126 users, 2.92 / 5
- [windowflash](https://chrome-stats.com/d/windowflash)
- [m/sflash](https://chrome-stats.com/d/m-sflash)
- [retro flashback](https://chrome-stats.com/d/retro-flashback)
- [flashes](https://chrome-stats.com/d/flashes)

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/flash-vs-flash-reverse)