Total ratings
3.50
(Rating count:
12)
Review summary
Pros
- Saves time by collecting citations in one place for easy copy-pasting.
- Provides citation formats that can be adjusted and proofread easily.
- Convenient shortcut (Ctrl+Alt+C) to open the sidebar once functionality is understood.
- Free alternative compared to paid citation tools, appreciated by some users.
Cons
- Frequently generates inaccurate citations with errors in author name, publication date, title, and missing journal details.
- Lacks MLA 9 and Biblatex citation format support.
- User interface and functionality are not intuitive; lacking clear instructions or documentation about usage.
- Extension icon may not display after installation, causing confusion.
- Citation output often requires manual corrections leading to more effort than manual citation creation.
Upgrade to see all 13 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
3.40
All time rating average:
3.50
Upgrade to see all 13 reviews
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-16 | ig***** | ||
2024-06-14 | ***** | Does not support MLA 9 | |
2023-01-29 | Jo***** | ||
2022-08-31 | Je***** | Pretty nice to use, once you realise the functionality is hidden away a bit (use Ctrl+Alt+C to open the sidebar). I wish it had an option for Biblatex as well as Bibtex, as that has a specific "@online" type. The "Updated" field is often inaccurate as well, just set to the current date. Generally speaking you need to proof read any citations this add ons produces as it often has to guess the author name and gets it wrong. | |
2021-04-24 | ***** | It's really trying but doesn't actually work. The extension grabs the information that it thinks is relevant from the open site and arranges it into what looks like a citation, but the amount of errors mean that I'm constantly fixing and second-guessing the provided citation, so it really would be quicker to do it manually or to use a citing site. For example, I just tried to cite an article directly from JSTOR and it's given me the below: Subject. (2021) Confounding Gender on JSTOR. Retrieved April 24, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3175248?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents The author's name isn't "Subject;" the article was published in 1997, not 2021; the title is "Confounding Gender," without "on JSTOR;" and the URL has tracking info. Also, although all this information is clearly listed in the open page, the citation skips over journal name, volume, number, and pages. I understand it's difficult to program these things, but this extension just isn't ready. | |
2020-06-03 | c_***** | TERRIBLE and full of errors and definitely NOT APA 7th edition. DO NOT USE. Deleted. | |
2020-03-09 | Wa***** | ||
2020-02-15 | Am***** | ||
2020-02-02 | Ka***** | I have to say I'm impressed, shocked and amazed. You have saved me so much time and now money. If you develop software or charge for the app I will buy this without a second thought al this time I was paying Cite This for Me. I love all citations are collected and one only has to copy and paste, then adjust the text if the layout is set for Hanging in Word. Thank you very much as of today you have earned the title of Mangod or Womangod the add-on works perfectly. If possible develop a Word add-in so info goes directly to Word. Again thank you for making life easy! | |
2019-05-03 | wi***** | Bug: Icon of "Cite This!" extension isn't displayed after installation (FF 66.0.3 with a few reasonable extensions installed). BUT what is *really frustrating* is total lack of any (even very basic) information about usage. [Unfortunately, it is the typical fault of FF Add-ons developers :-( ] 1. No information that after installation there should be an icon (I've learned it from reviews), nor information what happens when you press the extension shortcut key (or - probably - click its icon). 2. No reference to information on formats of citations generated by the extension. 3. No usage examples (even screenshots). 4. Lack of information what is the result of extension action (less important, nevertheless, inconvenient; it could be added in the basic description perhaps in place of reference to the expected location of comments and feature requests...) |
Upgrade to see all 13 reviews
Popular extensions / apps
Here are some popular extensions / apps that you might be interested in:
uBlock Origin Lite
Raymond Hill (gorhill)
Wish: Shop and Save
Wish US Holdings LLC
Dark Reader
alexanderby
Good Pizza, Great Pizza
TapBlaze

Ghostery – Privacy Ad Blocker
Ghostery
BB: Banco, Conta, Pix, Crédito
Banco do Brasil SA
Farm Land - Farming life game
Homa
Bolt: Request a Ride
Bolt Technology
Gym Heros: Fighting Game
Fighting Arena
Flipkart Online Shopping App
Flipkart
Coupert - Automatic Coupon Finder & Cashback
https://www.coupert.com/

uBlock Origin
Raymond Hill